Is digitalization the 6th Kondratieff wave?
Trends & Innovations

The Digital Economy – Is Digitalization The Sixth Kondratieff Wave?

| | Director Business Unit E-Invoicing/SAP&Web Process, SEEBURGER
Is digitalization the 6th Kondratieff wave? The theory of the long waves

Over the last 75 years or so, digitalization has become an indispensable part of our lives, permeating nearly every area. The invention of the first operational digital computer back in 1941 was the starting shot for an intensive digital development journey. Factories, offices and entire companies were digitally networked and automated, first internally, then with external partners. These days, the whole world is digitally networked over the internet, satellites and cable, right down to the darkest corners of our personal lives. Due to the speed and comprehensiveness at which it spread, digitalization is often considered to be a pillar of the sixth Kondratieff wave. But does digitalization really meet all the Kondratieff criteria?

Digitalization and the Digital Economy in the Context of Kondratieff’s Long Wave Theory

At the beginning of the 20th century, the Russian economist Nikolai Kondratieff developed his long wave theory, in which he describes the waves of economic development over the last 250 years or so. He attributes these economic cycles to paradigm shifts and the associated investment in innovation, and was able to empirically show the existence of five such waves during this time period. The main characteristics of the five Kondratieff waves and their effects on industry and society are summarised below:

First Kondratieff wave (ca. 1780-1850)

  • Early mechanisation
  • Transition from an agricultural society to an industrial society
  • Introduction of steam-driven machines into industry (textiles industry)
    • Clothing

Second Kondratieff wave (ca. 1850-1890)

  • Building of the railways
  • Steel mass production
  • Development of ship travel
    • Mass transportation

Third Kondratieff wave (ca. 1890-1950)

  • Innovations in electrotechnology (electric motor, radio, telephone, electric light)
  • New products in the chemical industry
    • Mass consumption

Fourth Kondratieff wave (ca. 1940-1970)

  • Fundamental innovations in integrated circuitry
  • Nuclear energy
  • Car production
  • Petrochemicals
    • Individual mobility

Fifth Kondratieff wave (ca. 1970 – 2000)

  • Information & Communication Technology (ICT)
  • Computer industry
    • Information and communication
Is Digitalization the 6th Kondratieff Wave?
Figure 1: Is Digitalization the 6th Kondratieff Wave?[1]

What turns an economic cycle into a Kondratieff wave and how does digitalization fit into this?

A Kondratieff wave typically lasts for between 40-60 years and is triggered by ground-breaking discoveries; technological, ʽfundamentalʼ innovations, which open up completely new markets. These fundamental innovations have led the transition from the textile to the steel ages; from the discovery of the electrodynamo principle and the developments in modern chemistry to an industrial society complete with mass transportation, and finally, to the information society, which has its origins in the 1950s. A Kondratieff wave has three main characteristics; a new market opening up, full employment and a ʽlifecycleʼ of 40-60 years. How do digitalization and the digital economy fit into this picture?

What is the digital economy?

The digital economy was first coined as the title of a 1997 book by Dan Tapscott, in which he looks at ʽpromise and peril in the age of networked intelligenceʼ[2], referring particularly to the internet and how digital technology was starting to change how people interact with each other. This was a development which started during the fifth Kondratieff wave, with the personal computer, the internet, the world wide web and global networking all being being developed in that era. Indeed, digitalization was a driver and pillar of the fifth long wave. By the end of this wave at the end of the 20th century, digital networks had already encroached into all levels of society. Therefore, in and of itself, digitalization cannot be considered to be the sixth wave.

The spread of digitalization in the fifth Kondratieff wave
Figure 2: The spread of digitalization in the fifth Kondratieff wave[3]
Digitalization, however, doesn’t only mean using information technology to manage data or support business processes. It also encompasses the development of new business models in the digital economy. In a digital economy, old, asset-based business models are replaced by concepts driven by data and based on networks. ʽDigital twinsʼ have been developed to help along the old, manual processes. Data models the whole length of the value chain have been networked both internally and externally. These digital images are essentially shared, public property. There is no competition as to who gets to use them, as they can be used to their full scope by several people at the same time. Looking at them from a costing perspective, the reproduction cost of these digital copies of real objects is therefore essentially zero. As an incremental cost calculation of network costs over the internet also delivers an extremely low sum, the digital economy is therefore characterised by being of ʽdouble-zero marginal costʼ. That is the key to the enormous growth potential of digital economies and the scalability of digital business models. However, this doesn’t make digitalization a completely new market, which is one of the main criteria for a new Kondratieff wave.

Digitalization also doesn’t meet the condition of full employment. On the contrary, digitalization often makes jobs obsolete, and the jobs it creates in turn tend not to be as numerous as the jobs it has replaced. Just look at the number of new jobs created in the 18th Century by the burgeoning textiles industry, and later on by the growing steel industry and the building of the railways. Or at the number of employees needed in the automobile and computer industries in the latter half of the 20th century. The number of jobs created by digital economies just can’t compare.

Finally, digitalization does not have a lifecycle as understood in the context of Kondratieff waves. Digitalization started longer ago than the 40-60 years which make up a typical cycle and is nowhere near over yet. Only a small sector of digitalization; the information technology industry, would meet the Kondratieff conditions for a lifecycle. Information technology entered the market as a fundamental, technological innovation and spread dynamically, creating both a large number of jobs and developing huge economic power. However, by the end of the fifth long wave, IT had lost its leading role for the economy as a whole, moving its focus to making information services and media accessible. These days, it’s no longer the manufacturers of the information technology who determine the development of the information economy, rather its users such as Google, Facebook & Amazon.

Where does digitalization fit into the Kondratieff model?

In the ʽquestions’ section of his dedicated Kondratieff website, the scientist Leo A. Nefiodow draws an illuminating comparison to railway technology. To paraphrase, he states that once the railway had connected the cities and towns, the second wave ended. The railway lost its leading function in the economy and became just an ordinary industry.[4] This is what is happening with computers and digitalization. The technology has been invented, the tracks are laid, and the trains move. Now, it’s the users (from the logistics providers to the passengers) who determine its further path. Digitalization has become a perfectly ordinary industry, which has permeated every area of of our lives and which we can no longer do without.

Digitalization allows the digital economy to reduce costs and increase productivity. Strategy-wise, it opens completely new possibilities for growth, especially in established, saturated markets. Platform strategies are innovative business models in the digital economy, which generate high value and lead to monolopy-type structures. The universal spread of smartphones, the “always on” mentality and the increasing integration of ʽthingsʼ in the internet (IoT – Internet of Things) are both the basis for further digital services and support their ever increasing spread. Digitalization is an integral part of the 21st century at the beginning of the sixth Kondratieff wave, which we could no longer live without. However, it is not a technological revolution like the invention of the computer, rather it builds upon that, taking it further.

Integration platforms can help accelerate a digital transformation process, as the biggest challenges in digital transformation are:

  • Connecting the many different IT subsystems
  • Creating interfaces for access to third party resources
  • Building bridges between innovation projects and legacy solutions

An integration platform allows you to merge and evaluate data from different sources, to accelerate business processes, or to establish new ways for employees, clients and partners to work together, creating a digital economy.

The more complex a company’s IT system is, the more difficult it is to keep up a pace of development commensurate with the demands of digital transformation and the digital economy. Taking advantage of a flexible integration strategy based on a platform such as SEEBURGER’s can really lighten the load.


[1] In Anlehnung an Leo A. Nefiodow, Kondratieff.net, April 2017 Digitalisierung | kondratieff

[2] The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence. Tapscott, Dan. McGraw-Hill; 1st May 1997

[3] Based on Leo A. Nefiodow, Kondratieff.net, April 2017 Digitalisierung | kondratieff

[4] Digitalization cannot be the carrier of the sixth Kondratieff, Leo A. Nefiodow, November 2017. https://www.kondratieff.net/questions

Get in contact with us:

Please enter details about your project in the message section so we can direct your inquiry to the right consultant.

Share this post, choose your platform!

Rolf Holicki

Written by:

Rolf Holicki, Director BU E-Invoicing, SAP&Web Process, is responsible for the SAP/WEB applications. He has more than 25 years of experience in e-invoicing, SAP, Workflow and business process automation. Rolf Holicki has been with SEEBURGER since 2005.